CO129-245 - Acting Governor Fleming - 1890 [5-7] — Page 15

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

been allowed to be introduced. I am a shareholder in the Company and ought, perhaps, to have taken steps at an earlier stage to oppose the passing of the measure, but I assure Your Excellency that I calculated on the Bill being thrown out or withdrawn immediately on its coming before the Attorney General.

My objections are more of a legal and constitutional character than of the class to be expected from a person simply in the position of a shareholder. As a shareholder, I admit that the Company stands in need of alteration and improvement, but I do not admit that the powers sought and obtained by means of this Ordinance are quite in the right direction. I am of opinion that if the Company has unwisely raised a capital far beyond the needs and requirements of this Colony, it should reduce its capital and return their money to the shareholders; but even if I thought that the association really needed more room for development it would still appear to me that the absolutely unlimited powers taken under the present Ordinance are excessive and dangerous, and I should oppose it on that ground.

My objections to the Ordinance are not, however, taken in my capacity as a shareholder, although my being a shareholder gives me a Locus Standi in addressing Your Excellency and must add weight to my words.

I oppose this Ordinance and beg of Your Excellency to refuse to send it forth to the world with your name appended,

1 because it infringes one of the principles most stringently inculcated and enforced by the law of England with reference to limited liability companies, the principle

Edit History

2026-05-26 03:01:03 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
been allowed to be introduced. I am a shareholder in the Company and ought, perhaps, to have taken steps at an earlier stage to oppose the passing of the measure, but I assure Your Excellency that I calculated on the Bill being thrown out or withdrawn immediately on its coming before the Attorney General. My objections are more of a legal and constitutional character than of the class to be expected from a person simply in the position of a shareholder. As a shareholder, I admit that the Company stands in need of alteration and improvement, but I do not admit that the powers sought and obtained by means of this Ordinance are quite in the right direction. I am of opinion that if the Company has unwisely raised a capital far beyond the needs and requirements of this Colony, it should reduce its capital and return their money to the shareholders; but even if I thought that the association really needed more room for development it would still appear to me that the absolutely unlimited powers taken under the present Ordinance are excessive and dangerous, and I should oppose it on that ground. My objections to the Ordinance are not, however, taken in my capacity as a shareholder, although my being a shareholder gives me a Locus Standi in addressing Your Excellency and must add weight to my words. I oppose this Ordinance and beg of Your Excellency to refuse to send it forth to the world with your name appended, 1 because it infringes one of the principles most stringently inculcated and enforced by the law of England with reference to limited liability companies, the principle
Baseline (Original)
13 been allowed to be introduced. I am a shareholder in the Company and ought, perhaps, to have taken steps at an earlier stage to oppose the passing of the measure, but I assure Your Excellency that I calculated on the Bill being thrown out or withdrawn immediately on its coming before the Attorney General. My objections are more of a legal and consti- tutional character than of the class to be expected from d person simply in the position of a shareholder. As a share- holder, I admit that the Company stands in need of alteration and improvement, but I do not admit that the powers sought and obtained by means of this Ordinance are quite in the right direction. I am of opinion that if the Company has unwisely raised a capital far beyond the neeas and require- ments of this Colony, it should reduce its capital and re- turn their money to the shareholders; but even if I thought that the association really needed more room for develop- ment it would still appear to me that the absolutely unli- mited powers taken under the present Ordinance are excessive and dangerous, and I should oppose it on that ground. My objections to the Ordinance are not however taken in my capacity as a shareholder, although my being a shareholder gives me a Locus Stanai in addressing Your Excellency and must add weight to my words. I oppose this Ordinance and beg of Your Excellency to refuse to send it forth to the world with your name app enu ea 1 because it infringes one of the principles most stringently inculcated and enforced by the law of En- gland with reference to limited liability companies, the principle
2026-05-26 03:01:03 · Baseline
View content

13

been allowed to be introduced. I am a shareholder in the

Company and ought, perhaps, to have taken steps at an earlier stage to oppose the passing of the measure, but I

assure Your Excellency that I calculated on the Bill being

thrown out or withdrawn immediately on its coming before

the Attorney General.

My objections are more of a legal and consti-

tutional character than of the class to be expected from d

person simply in the position of a shareholder. As a share-

holder, I admit that the Company stands in need of alteration

and improvement, but I do not admit that the powers sought and obtained by means of this Ordinance are quite in the

right direction. I am of opinion that if the Company has

unwisely raised a capital far beyond the neeas and require- ments of this Colony, it should reduce its capital and re- turn their money to the shareholders; but even if I thought

that the association really needed more room for develop- ment it would still appear to me that the absolutely unli- mited powers taken under the present Ordinance are excessive

and dangerous, and I should oppose it on that ground.

My objections to the Ordinance are not

however taken in my capacity as a shareholder, although my being a shareholder gives me a Locus Stanai in addressing

Your Excellency and must add weight to my words.

I oppose this Ordinance and beg of Your

Excellency to refuse to send it forth to the world with your

name app enu ea

1 because it infringes one of the principles

most stringently inculcated and enforced by the law of En-

gland with reference to limited liability companies, the

principle

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.